The BD Insyte Autoguard™ and BD Insyte-N™ Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheters are designed to provide safety activation with a push of a button and is completely encapsulated after activation to help reduce the risk of needlestick injury. BD Instaflash™ Needle Technology is designed to confirm immediate vessel entry at the point of insertion and to help improve first-stick success.
true
BD Insyte Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter
Advance safety at the push of a button
- Overview
- Products & Accessories
- EIFU & Resources
true
Enhanced safety
The use of safety engineered devices and proper education can lead up to a 9.2% reduction in sharps injuries. The Insyte Autoguard™ Shielded IV Catheter is designed to provide safety activation with a push of a button and is completely encapsulated after activation to reduce the risk of needlestick injury.
First-stick success
Instaflash™ Needle Technology, available on 20, 22 and 24 gauge sizes, incorporates a notched needle, which has clinically demonstrated improved first-attempt insertion success, reducing painful hit-and-miss insertions.^,1-2
^Compared to a non-notched needle
Minimized phlebitis
Proprietary BD Vialon™ Catheter Material softens, enabling longer dwell time and reducing the chance of phlebitis up to 69%.*,3-5
*Compared to an FEP catheter
1. van Loon FHJ, Timmerman R, den Brok GPH, Korsten EHM, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. The impact of a notched peripheral intravenous catheter on the first attempt success rate in hospitalized adults: block-randomized trial. JVA. 2021 DOI: 10.1177/1129729821990217.
2. Seetharam AM, Raju U, Suresh K. A randomized controlled study to compare first stick success with Instaflash technology: The FIRSST study. JVA. 2022 DOI:10.1177/11297298221080369.
3. Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion thrombophlebitis: a prospective comparison of 645 Vialon and Teflon cannulae in anaesthetic and postoperative use. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1988;16:265-271.
4. Kus B, Buyukyilmaz F. Effectiveness of Vialon biomaterial versus Teflon catheters for peripheral intravenous placement: A randomized clinical trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;e12328.
5. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:845-854.
BD-112349 (03/24)
true
Sort by:
-
BD Nexiva™ Diffusics™ closed IV catheter system -
Patient room collectors
-
BD Insyte™ Autoguard™ BC shielded IV catheter with blood control technology
-
BD PosiFlush™ Pre-Filled Saline Syringe
-
Sharps collectors
-
BD Saf-T-Intima™ closed IV catheter system
-
BD Introsyte™ Autoguard™ shielded introducer for PICC and midline catheters
1. van Loon FHJ, Timmerman R, den Brok GPH, Korsten EHM, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouwman ARA. The impact of a notched peripheral intravenous catheter on the first attempt success rate in hospitalized adults: block-randomized trial. JVA. 2021 DOI: 10.1177/1129729821990217.
2. Seetharam AM, Raju U, Suresh K. A randomized controlled study to compare first stick success with Instaflash technology: The FIRSST study. JVA. 2022 DOI:10.1177/11297298221080369.
3. Gaukroger PB, Roberts JG, Manners TA. Infusion thrombophlebitis: a prospective comparison of 645 Vialon and Teflon cannulae in anaesthetic and postoperative use. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1988;16:265-271.
4. Kus B, Buyukyilmaz F. Effectiveness of Vialon biomaterial versus Teflon catheters for peripheral intravenous placement: A randomized clinical trial. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020;e12328.
5. Maki DG, Ringer M. Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;114:845-854.
BD-112349 (03/24)
true
Literature
BD's collection of literature on industry and on our offerings gives you information you can use to continue striving for excellence.
Learn more
true
true