true
Icon to close the modal
Support
Sales
Phone Icon
1.844.8.BD.LIFE (1.844.823.5433)
Modal Close Icon

Capability:

Product Line:

Icon to close thank you modal
Thank you for contacting our sales team!
A sales representive will get in touch with you shortly.
Ordering
Phone Icon
1.844.8.BD.LIFE (1.844.823.5433)
Onsite Visiting
Location Icon
850 W Rio Salado Pkwy, Tempe, AZ 85281 United States
Customer Service
Phone Icon
1.844.8.BD.LIFE (1.844.823.5433)
6:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. Arizona Time (Monday-Friday)
Fax Icon
1.800.440.5376

Venovo™ Venous Stent System

Purpose-Built for the Iliofemoral Veins 

 

Contact Us
Background Image
Loading
Overview
false

Overview and Procedure

Purpose-Built Iliofemoral Venous Stent

  • Flared ends designed to reduce stent migration and maximize wall apposition
  • Designed for use in high compression iliofemoral venous obstructions
  • Open-cell, flexible design to conform to vessel curvature while maintaining lumen diameter
  • Highest mean radial resistive force among tested iliofemoral venous stents2
  • Tantalum markers for enhanced visibility under fluoroscopy
  • Minimal foreshortening for maximum lesion coverage3

 

Placement Accuracy

 

Triaxial delivery system designed for:

  • Ease of use
  • Deployment control
  • Precise placement accuracy    
  • Operator control with an ergonomic handle and dual-speed thumbwheels
References

As of September 2022

2Radial resistive force was tested at 13 mm crimp diameter (1 mm oversizing) using a radial expansion force gauge. Results shown as averages measured in N/mm as follows (n=6): Venovo™ Venous Stent System (0.126), Medtronic Abre™ Venous Stent (0.1035), Cook Zilver® Vena™ (0.063) and Boston Scientific VICI VENOUS STENT® (0.054). Data on file. Bench tests may not be indicative of clinical performance. Different test methods may yield different results. 

3Foreshortening is calculated as the difference, represented as percentage, between the compressed stent length and expanded stent length at minimum/maximum oversize (1-3 mm). Across all sizes, foreshortening ranged from -4% to 10%, with a mean of 2.9% (values based on mathematical calculations). Data on file, BD Peripheral Intervention, Tempe, AZ.

Please consult Instructions for Use for product indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential complications, adverse events and detailed safety information.

Venovo IFU

BD - 23533v3

Products & Accessories
RELATED PRODUCTS NOT AVAILABLE

References

Please consult Instructions for Use for product indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential complications, adverse events and detailed safety information.

BD - 23533v3

Overview

Help Prevent Stent Migration with Flared Ends

The Venovo™ Venous Stent is the ONLY venous stent engineered with flared ends.*

Why Flared Ends?

Card Image

The flared ends on the Venovo™ Venous Stent were intentionally designed for two reasons:

 

  1. To maximize wall apposition
  2. To help prevent stent migration

Comparative Bench Testing

The Venovo™ Venous Stent had the highest mean pull-out force, interpreted as migration resistance, among tested iliofemoral venous stents in simulated use testing.2,3

References

As of September 2022

2Radial resistive force was tested at 13 mm crimp diameter (1 mm oversizing) using a radial expansion force gauge. Results shown as averages measured in N/mm as follows (n=6): Venovo™ Venous Stent System (0.126), Medtronic Abre™ Venous Stent (0.1035), Cook Zilver® Vena™ (0.063) and Boston Scientific VICI VENOUS STENT® (0.054). Data on file. Bench tests may not be indicative of clinical performance. Different test methods may yield different results. 

3Foreshortening is calculated as the difference, represented as percentage, between the compressed stent length and expanded stent length at minimum/maximum oversize (1-3 mm). Across all sizes, foreshortening ranged from -4% to 10%, with a mean of 2.9% (values based on mathematical calculations). Data on file, BD Peripheral Intervention, Tempe, AZ.

Please consult Instructions for Use for product indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential complications, adverse events and detailed safety information.

Venovo IFU

BD - 23533v3

Clinical Summary

Proven Long-Term Results Backed by 36-Month Data1

The VERNACULAR study results provide scientific evidence that the Venovo™ Venous Stent System is safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous
outflow obstruction.

 

  • Card Image

    Kaplan-Meier Primary Patency in Post-Thrombotic Lesions at 36 months

  • Card Image

    Kaplan-Meier Primary Patency in Non-Thrombotic Lesions at 36 months

  • Card Image

    Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at 36 months

  • Card Image

    Stent Fractures at 36 months

VERNACULAR Clinical Study1

Study Design

Prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm; Core lab & Data Safety Monitoring Board

 


Purpose

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the Venovo™ Venous Stent
for the treatment of iliofemoral venous occlusive disease.

As Treated Population

170 subjects at 21 sites in the U.S., Europe, and Australia/New Zealand

Primary Endpoints*

  • Primary safety: Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE), including stent migrations, at 30 days

 

 

 

  • Primary Effectiveness: Primary Patency at 12 months
    • Weighted Primary Patency at 12-Months: 88.6%
      • Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS): 81.7%
      • Non-Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesion (NIVL): 97.1%

 

 Key Secondary Endpoints

  • Placement accuracy: 100%
  • Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) through 36 months

 

36-Month Results

(Kaplan-Meier estimated Primary Patency)

Primary Patency: 84.0%

  • PTS: 74.8%
  • NIVL: 95.5%

 

* Evaluated against literature derived performance goal of 74% for efficacy (p<.0001) and 89% for safety (p=.032)

Significant Improvements

References

1The Venovo™ Venous Stent System was studied in the global VERNACULAR clinical trial, which was a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study of 170 patients. The primary effectiveness endpoint of the study was primary patency (PP) at 12 months post-index procedure, defined as: freedom from TVR and freedom from thrombus occlusion and stenosis > 50% as measured by DUS. Patients who received a Venovo™ Venous Stent had a weighted PP rate of 88.6%, demonstrating a statistically significant difference from a literature-derived performance goal (PG) of 74%, with an 81.7% PP rate for subjects with post-thrombotic syndrome and 97.1% PP rate for subjects with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) through 30 days post-index procedure. Freedom from MAE was 93.5%, demonstrating a statistically significant difference from a literature-derived PG of 89%. There were no stent migrations associated with CEC-adjudicated events at the 30-day primary safety endpoint or through 36 months. Primary Patency by Kaplan-Meier estimates at 36 months are 84.0% for the total population (N=170), 74.8% for subjects with post-thrombotic syndrome (N=93) and 95.5% for subjects with non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions. Secondary endpoints included acute technical success, Quality of Life (QoL) assessment, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS – Pain score) and stent fractures. Results demonstrated 100% acute technical success, defined as successful deployment of stent(s) to intended target with adequate lesion coverage as assessed by the Investigator at the time of the index procedure. TLR is defined as the first revascularization procedure in the target vessel(s) following the index procedure, as determined by an Independent Core Lab. The Freedom from TLR rate at 36 months was 88.1%. At the 36-month follow-up, the CIVIQ-20 assessment demonstrated a change from baseline in the total study population of -16.8 and, for the VCSS Pain score, a change from baseline in the total population of -1.8. Stents were evaluated at the 36-month follow-up for fracture analysis. An anteroposterior and lateral x-ray for each evaluated stent were sent to an independent core lab for analysis. 98 subjects’ x-rays were analyzed and no stent fractures were reported. Missing x-ray analyses were recorded as protocol deviations. Dake, Michael D, et al. “Three-Year Results from the Venovo Venous Stent Study for the Treatment of Iliac and Femoral Vein Obstruction.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 44, no. 12, Dec. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021- 02975-2. Epub 2021 Sep 20

Please consult Instructions for Use for product indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential complications, adverse events and detailed safety information.

BD - 23533v3

Resources

References

Please consult Instructions for Use for product indications for use, contraindications, warnings, precautions, potential complications, adverse events and detailed safety information.

BD - 23533v3

true